Conversation
|
Looks like |
|
Ah, well, aside from it not fully working it looks really nice 😉 |
|
It's much simpler now 😄 |
|
How are the false positives arising? |
|
Not sure yet, but I'll look into it. |
|
Hah, it's failing because |
|
It just means we need to patch |
|
What on earth is that? 😉 Apparently needed by |
|
I haven't tested |
|
|
|
|
Looks great! +:100: :shipit: |
|
Although, there are non-transformers test failures in there too, is that because the tests are wrong now? |
|
Oops, you're right. Looks like it's matching the |
|
Hmm, GHC gives So maybe we should let that test fail now. |
|
Should we turn that into a failing test then, or do you think it's something that could be addressed? I guess if the new behaviour agrees with GHC then perhaps it is right 😉 |
|
I think it should probably be a failing test, yeah. I can't get to it today, but hopefully can make this mergeable tomorrow. |
|
Oops, merging #1410 means this now conflicts. |
|
I'm more than happy for this to go in whenever you're ready, by the way. |
|
Could you please run your tool and find reverse dependencies for |
|
I'm currently working on a fix for #1244, I'd really like to get that in for 0.7.4, hopefully it shouldn't take too much longer. I'll run off that list once I'm done :) Also suffering from internet problems today so not actually present in IRC, posting this from my phone... |
Fix #421, match type instance heads eagerly
|
I can figure out the dependent modules, that's ok. I can make a |
|
|
|
|
Oh |
|
Yeah, via |
|
No need for a version bump on those then, but we can update the dependency version. It's not going to break any code to pull in |
/cc @garyb
Still a WIP, but probably near enough to review.