Skip to content

chore: consolidate config for google-django-spanner#16657

Closed
parthea wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
parthea-patch-14
Closed

chore: consolidate config for google-django-spanner#16657
parthea wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
parthea-patch-14

Conversation

@parthea
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@parthea parthea commented Apr 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the .librarian/config.yaml file by adding a generate_blocked flag to the google-django-spanner library and removing the django-google-spanner entry. The review feedback suggests reordering the YAML keys for google-django-spanner to maintain consistency with the existing entries in the configuration file.

Comment thread .librarian/config.yaml
Comment on lines 8 to 10
- id: google-django-spanner
generate_blocked: true
release_blocked: true
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency with other entries in this configuration file, it is recommended to place the generate_blocked key first in the list item. This aligns with the pattern seen in other entries like google-cloud-storage and db-dtypes where status flags precede the library identifier.

  - generate_blocked: true
    id: google-django-spanner
    release_blocked: true

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the wrong way round. django-google-spanner is the correct name, both in terms of files and state file entries.

@parthea parthea closed this Apr 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants