Skip to content

docs(animations): remove incorrect information regarding animateChild#44216

Closed
dario-piotrowicz wants to merge 1 commit into
angular:masterfrom
dario-piotrowicz:amend-animation-docs-on-animateChild
Closed

docs(animations): remove incorrect information regarding animateChild#44216
dario-piotrowicz wants to merge 1 commit into
angular:masterfrom
dario-piotrowicz:amend-animation-docs-on-animateChild

Conversation

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz commented Nov 18, 2021

Remove incorrect information present in the angular.io animations documentation
stating that animateChild does not work with route transition animations
as that turned out not to be true

This PR effectively reverts the changes make in PR: #44014

For more context see issue #30477

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • angular.io application / infrastructure changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

Some information in the angular.io animations documentation turned out to be inaccurate, the info tells the user that the animateChild function doesn't work with route transition animation which is not actually the case
(as I showed in stackblitz the the issue's thread)

What is the new behavior?

The information has been amended and the workarounds I've found while looking into the issues are also presented to the user

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

  • @petebacondarwin 🙂👍
  • @michaelurban sorry for reverting the changes you made in your PR 😓, but after the conversations in the issue's thread I feel like they would be misleading to the user, I hope you don't mind me doing so 🙂

@google-cla google-cla Bot added the cla: yes label Nov 18, 2021
@pullapprove pullapprove Bot requested a review from jelbourn November 18, 2021 23:24
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz force-pushed the amend-animation-docs-on-animateChild branch 2 times, most recently from 1529fcb to 01d10d8 Compare November 18, 2021 23:28
Comment thread aio/content/guide/route-animations.md Outdated
Comment thread aio/content/guide/route-animations.md Outdated
Comment thread aio/content/guide/animations.md Outdated
@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note: this PR is related to #44243, the result of that PR will likely change what this PR should change in the docs

Remove incorrect information present in the angular.io animations documentation
stating that animateChild does not work with route transition animations
as that turned out not to be true

This PR effectively reverts the changes make in PR: angular#44014

For more context see issue angular#30477
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz force-pushed the amend-animation-docs-on-animateChild branch from f7107f9 to d5bd538 Compare November 23, 2021 20:24
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz changed the title docs(animations): amend incorrect information regarding animateChild docs(animations): remove incorrect information regarding animateChild Nov 23, 2021
@AndrewKushnir AndrewKushnir added action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Nov 24, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jessicajaniuk jessicajaniuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🍪

Thanks for fixing this!

@jessicajaniuk jessicajaniuk added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer labels Nov 24, 2021
@jessicajaniuk jessicajaniuk removed the request for review from jelbourn November 24, 2021 18:52
@jessicajaniuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR was merged into the repository by commit 7b0e9b0.

jessicajaniuk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2021
…#44216)

Remove incorrect information present in the angular.io animations documentation
stating that animateChild does not work with route transition animations
as that turned out not to be true

This PR effectively reverts the changes make in PR: #44014

For more context see issue #30477

PR Close #44216
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz deleted the amend-animation-docs-on-animateChild branch November 24, 2021 19:03
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 25, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants