Skip to content

gh-148467: Move io.TextIOBase docs to "I/O Base Classes" section#150015

Closed
Dhruv-Soni wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
Dhruv-Soni:fix-issue-148467
Closed

gh-148467: Move io.TextIOBase docs to "I/O Base Classes" section#150015
Dhruv-Soni wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
Dhruv-Soni:fix-issue-148467

Conversation

@Dhruv-Soni

@Dhruv-Soni Dhruv-Soni commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The TextIOBase class documentation was previously placed under "Text I/O"
alongside concrete implementations like TextIOWrapper and StringIO, while
the other two base classes (RawIOBase, BufferedIOBase) live under "I/O
Base Classes". Move TextIOBase to join its siblings, making the docs
structure consistent.

  The TextIOBase class documentation was previously placed under "Text I/O"
  alongside concrete implementations like TextIOWrapper and StringIO, while
  the other two base classes (RawIOBase, BufferedIOBase) live under "I/O
  Base Classes". Move TextIOBase to join its siblings, making the docs
  structure consistent.
@read-the-docs-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 cpython-previews | 🛠️ Build #32743859 | 📁 Comparing 5841464 against main (806c997)

  🔍 Preview build  

1 file changed
± library/io.html

@Dhruv-Soni
Dhruv-Soni marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 18:56
@cmaloney

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

From my last comment: #148467 (comment) rather than move the Text I/O one want to move all the others to be in the specific section. That is TextIOBAse lives next to StringIO and TextIOWrapper; BufferedIOBase lives next to the BytesIO and Buffered* classes; RawIOBase lives next to FileIO.

@StanFromIreland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favour of #150838.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Todo to Done in Sprint Jul 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Todo
Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants