Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
http: improve performance for incoming headers
  • Loading branch information
starkwang committed Feb 11, 2019
commit fde1c7269b13c09f924deea34e4de03848fcd542
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions benchmark/_http-benchmarkers.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,9 +24,12 @@ class AutocannonBenchmarker {
'-d', options.duration,
'-c', options.connections,
'-j',
'-n',
`http://127.0.0.1:${options.port}${options.path}`,
'-n'
];
for (let field in options.headers) {
args.push('-H', `${field}=${options.headers[field]}`)
}
args.push(`http://127.0.0.1:${options.port}${options.path}`)
const child = child_process.spawn(this.executable, args);
return child;
}
Expand Down
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions benchmark/http/incoming_headers.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common.js');
const http = require('http');

const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
// unicode confuses ab on os x.
c: [50, 500],
headerDuplicates: [0, 5, 20]
});

function main({ c, headerDuplicates }) {
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
res.end();
});

server.listen(common.PORT, () => {
const headers = {
'Content-Type': 'text/plain',
'Accept': 'text/plain',
'User-Agent': 'nodejs-benchmark',
'Date': new Date().toString(),
'Cache-Control': 'no-cache'
};
for (let i = 0; i < headerDuplicates; i++) {
headers[`foo${i}`] = `some header value ${i}`;
}
bench.http({
path: '/',
connections: c,
headers
}, () => {
server.close();
});
});
}
199 changes: 85 additions & 114 deletions lib/_http_incoming.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -137,130 +137,101 @@ function _addHeaderLines(headers, n) {

// 'array' header list is taken from:
// https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/netwerk/protocol/http/src/nsHttpHeaderArray.cpp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this comment might be outdated now? The link is dead at any rate.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This link is redirected to here. But I think it might not be a good way to keep an unstable url in comment. Should I remove it?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd be okay with removing it.

function matchKnownFields(field) {
var low = false;
while (true) {
switch (field) {
case 'Content-Type':
case 'content-type':
return 'content-type';
case 'Content-Length':
case 'content-length':
return 'content-length';
case 'User-Agent':
case 'user-agent':
return 'user-agent';
case 'Referer':
case 'referer':
return 'referer';
case 'Host':
case 'host':
return 'host';
case 'Authorization':
case 'authorization':
return 'authorization';
case 'Proxy-Authorization':
case 'proxy-authorization':
return 'proxy-authorization';
case 'If-Modified-Since':
case 'if-modified-since':
return 'if-modified-since';
case 'If-Unmodified-Since':
case 'if-unmodified-since':
return 'if-unmodified-since';
case 'From':
case 'from':
return 'from';
case 'Location':
case 'location':
function matchKnownFields(field, lowercased) {
switch (field.length) {
case 3:
if (field === 'Age' || field === 'age') return 'age';
break;
case 4:
if (field === 'Host' || field === 'host') return 'host';
if (field === 'From' || field === 'from') return 'from';
if (field === 'ETag' || field === 'etag') return 'etag';
if (field === 'Date' || field === 'date') return '\u0000date';
if (field === 'Vary' || field === 'vary') return '\u0000vary';
break;
case 6:
if (field === 'Server' || field === 'server') return 'server';
if (field === 'Cookie' || field === 'cookie') return '\u0002cookie';
if (field === 'Origin' || field === 'origin') return '\u0000origin';
if (field === 'Expect' || field === 'expect') return '\u0000expect';
if (field === 'Accept' || field === 'accept') return '\u0000accept';
break;
case 7:
if (field === 'Referer' || field === 'referer') return 'referer';
if (field === 'Expires' || field === 'expires') return 'expires';
if (field === 'Upgrade' || field === 'upgrade') return '\u0000upgrade';
break;
case 8:
if (field === 'Location' || field === 'location')
return 'location';
case 'Max-Forwards':
case 'max-forwards':
return 'max-forwards';
case 'Retry-After':
case 'retry-after':
return 'retry-after';
case 'ETag':
case 'etag':
return 'etag';
case 'Last-Modified':
case 'last-modified':
return 'last-modified';
case 'Server':
case 'server':
return 'server';
case 'Age':
case 'age':
return 'age';
case 'Expires':
case 'expires':
return 'expires';
case 'Set-Cookie':
case 'set-cookie':
if (field === 'If-Match' || field === 'if-Match')
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this supposed to be if-match instead of if-Match?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I'll change it.

return '\u0000if-match';
break;
case 10:
if (field === 'User-Agent' || field === 'user-agent')
return 'user-agent';
if (field === 'Set-Cookie' || field === 'set-cookie')
return '\u0001';
case 'Cookie':
case 'cookie':
return '\u0002cookie';
// The fields below are not used in _addHeaderLine(), but they are common
// headers where we can avoid toLowerCase() if the mixed or lower case
// versions match the first time through.
case 'Transfer-Encoding':
case 'transfer-encoding':
return '\u0000transfer-encoding';
case 'Date':
case 'date':
return '\u0000date';
case 'Connection':
case 'connection':
if (field === 'Connection' || field === 'connection')
return '\u0000connection';
case 'Cache-Control':
case 'cache-control':
break;
case 11:
if (field === 'Retry-After' || field === 'retry-after')
return 'retry-after';
break;
case 12:
if (field === 'Content-Type' || field === 'content-type')
return 'content-type';
if (field === 'Max-Forwards' || field === 'max-forwards')
return 'max-forwards';
break;
case 13:
if (field === 'Authorization' || field === 'authorization')
return 'authorization';
if (field === 'Last-Modified' || field === 'last-modified')
return 'last-modified';
if (field === 'Cache-Control' || field === 'cache-control')
return '\u0000cache-control';
case 'Vary':
case 'vary':
return '\u0000vary';
case 'Content-Encoding':
case 'content-encoding':
return '\u0000content-encoding';
case 'Origin':
case 'origin':
return '\u0000origin';
case 'Upgrade':
case 'upgrade':
return '\u0000upgrade';
case 'Expect':
case 'expect':
return '\u0000expect';
case 'If-Match':
case 'if-match':
return '\u0000if-match';
case 'If-None-Match':
case 'if-none-match':
if (field === 'If-None-Match' || field === 'if-none-match')
return '\u0000if-none-match';
case 'Accept':
case 'accept':
return '\u0000accept';
case 'Accept-Encoding':
case 'accept-encoding':
break;
case 14:
if (field === 'Content-Length' || field === 'content-length')
return 'content-length';
break;
case 15:
if (field === 'Accept-Encoding' || field === 'accept-encoding')
return '\u0000accept-encoding';
case 'Accept-Language':
case 'accept-language':
if (field === 'Accept-Language' || field === 'accept-language')
return '\u0000accept-language';
case 'X-Forwarded-For':
case 'x-forwarded-for':
if (field === 'X-Forwarded-For' || field === 'x-forwarded-for')
return '\u0000x-forwarded-for';
case 'X-Forwarded-Host':
case 'x-forwarded-host':
break;
case 16:
if (field === 'Content-Encoding' || field === 'content-encoding')
return '\u0000content-encoding';
if (field === 'X-Forwarded-Host' || field === 'x-forwarded-host')
return '\u0000x-forwarded-host';
case 'X-Forwarded-Proto':
case 'x-forwarded-proto':
break;
case 17:
if (field === 'If-Modified-Since' || field === 'if-modified-since')
return 'if-modified-since';
if (field === 'Transfer-Encoding' || field === 'transfer-encoding')
return '\u0000transfer-encoding';
if (field === 'X-Forwarded-Proto' || field === 'x-forwarded-proto')
return '\u0000x-forwarded-proto';
default:
if (low)
return '\u0000' + field;
field = field.toLowerCase();
low = true;
}
break;
case 19:
if (field === 'Proxy-Authorization' || field === 'proxy-authorization')
return 'proxy-authorization';
if (field === 'If-Unmodified-Since' || field === 'if-unmodified-since')
return 'if-unmodified-since';
break;
}
if (lowercased) {
return '\u0000' + field;
} else {
return matchKnownFields(field.toLowerCase(), true);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be slightly faster to use iteration than recursion. it might also be a wash, however. :-)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've run the benchmark of iteration and found there was no difference between them.

}
}
// Add the given (field, value) pair to the message
Expand Down