Skip to content

v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize #21196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ryzokuken wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize #21196

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b072d74
v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize
ryzokuken Jun 7, 2018
84414b2
fixup! v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize
ryzokuken Jun 7, 2018
c98b7b1
fixup! v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize
ryzokuken Jun 8, 2018
7e39fd1
fixup! v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize
ryzokuken Jun 11, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
fixup! v8: replace Buffer with FastBuffer in deserialize
  • Loading branch information
@ryzokuken
ryzokuken committed Jun 11, 2018
commit 7e39fd124d4d3870c7a2da04edafa559458367e9
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion test/parallel/test-v8-deserialize-buffer.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
'use strict';
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TimothyGu TimothyGu Jun 7, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need a Flags: --pending-deprecations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ryzokuken ryzokuken Jun 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add one, gimme a sec.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ryzokuken ryzokuken Jun 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, most other tests add --no-warnings too, but doesn't that kinda defeat the purpose of the test?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ryzokuken ryzokuken Jun 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Example:

// Flags: --pending-deprecation --no-warnings
'use strict';

const common = require('../common');

process.on('warning', common.mustNotCall());

Buffer.of(0, 1);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ryzokuken ryzokuken Jun 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it doesn't, the test fails with no warnings getting printed out, exactly like it should. Adding the line.


const common = require('../common');
const assert = require('assert');
const v8 = require('v8');

process.on('warning', common.mustNotCall());
Expand Down