Swift: extract precompiled swiftmodule files#9922
Merged
redsun82 merged 6 commits intoJul 29, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Previously we were not extracting any `swiftmodule` file that was not a system or a built-in one. This was done to avoid re-extracting `swiftmodule` files that were built previously in the same build, but it turned out to be too eager, as there are legitimate cases where a non-system, non-built-in precompiled swift module can be used. An example of that is the `PackageDescription` module used in Swift Package Manager manifest files (`Package.swift`). We now relax the test and trigger module extraction on all loaded modules that do not have source files (we trigger source file extraction for those). The catch, is that we also create empty trap files for current output `swiftmodule` files (including possible alias locations set up by XCode). This means that if a following extractor run loads a previously built `swiftmodule` file, although it will trigger module extraction, this will however be skipped as it will find its target file already present (this is done via the `TargetFile` semantics).
This should cover `-merge-modules` mode. Dumping of the configuration to the target files was moved to a separate pair of header/source files, as now it is also done in `SwiftOutputRewrite.cpp`.
AlexDenisov
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously we were not extracting any
swiftmodulefile that was nota system or a built-in one. This was done to avoid re-extracting
swiftmodulefiles that were built previously in the same build, but itturned out to be too eager, as there are legitimate cases where a
non-system, non-built-in precompiled swift module can be used. An
example of that is the
PackageDescriptionmodule used in SwiftPackage Manager manifest files (
Package.swift).We now relax the test and trigger module extraction on all loaded
modules that do not have source files (we trigger source file extraction
for those). The catch, is that we also create empty trap files for
current output
swiftmodulefiles (including possible alias locationsset up by XCode).
This means that if a following extractor run loads a previously built
swiftmodulefile, although it will trigger module extraction, thiswill however be skipped as it will find its target file already present
(this is done via the
TargetFilesemantics).