Conversation
a85783d to
49770e3
Compare
49770e3 to
5247aa5
Compare
5247aa5 to
f26b94d
Compare
allow to match on compiler name in rules #4177
f26b94d to
fbf84d5
Compare
|
hello! when is it going to be work in npm? right now ngtool/webpack is broken... |
Member
Author
|
maybe next week |
|
never mind whenever, but thanks |
|
any updates? thanks |
|
there was an update, but still same error |
|
what is 420? 4/20? April 20th? |
|
sorry it is an open issue in extrect-text-plugin by me. It is marked as bug, i was trying to ref it to that issue. |
|
ahhh, i was thinking too much smoking :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
Did you add tests for your changes?
not yet (TODO)
If relevant, link to documentation update:
not yet (TODO)
Summary
allow to apply plugins to child compiler
allow to match on compiler name in rules
see also #4177
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no