grouped aggregate microbenches#8301
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Onur Satici <onur@spiraldb.com>
Merging this PR will not alter performance
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[63] |
244.6 µs | 360.2 µs | -32.1% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[62] |
254.7 µs | 368.5 µs | -30.88% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[56] |
229.5 µs | 332 µs | -30.88% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[60] |
248.3 µs | 358.3 µs | -30.69% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[61] |
255.4 µs | 367.2 µs | -30.45% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[58] |
245.5 µs | 351.9 µs | -30.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[59] |
250.8 µs | 359 µs | -30.13% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[57] |
246.1 µs | 350.5 µs | -29.78% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[54] |
236.2 µs | 335 µs | -29.49% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[55] |
241.1 µs | 341.8 µs | -29.46% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[52] |
230 µs | 325 µs | -29.25% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[48] |
212.2 µs | 299.9 µs | -29.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[53] |
236 µs | 332.9 µs | -29.11% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[50] |
226.9 µs | 318.3 µs | -28.7% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[51] |
232 µs | 325.2 µs | -28.67% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[49] |
227.5 µs | 317 µs | -28.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[47] |
222.8 µs | 308.6 µs | -27.8% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[46] |
217.9 µs | 301.8 µs | -27.79% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[44] |
211.3 µs | 291.4 µs | -27.51% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[45] |
218.2 µs | 300.3 µs | -27.32% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing os/grouped-agg-bench (8d335eb) with develop (5e3aedb)
|
All microbenchmarks must be less than 1ms |
|
These aren't very micro benches |
Summary
Add a couple of grouped aggregation divan benchmarks