Skip to content

throws can reference exception without schema or package name - #1365

Merged
jgebal merged 1 commit into
developfrom
bugfix/throws_annotation_inconsistency
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

throws can reference exception without schema or package name#1365
jgebal merged 1 commit into
developfrom
bugfix/throws_annotation_inconsistency

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It is now possible to reference a variable name or exception name without providing fully qualified name. utPLSQL will resolve the name of variable based on current unit test package owner and current unit test package name.

Resolves: #1223

It is now possible to reference a variable name or exception name without providing fully qualified name. utPLSQL will resolve the name of variable based on current unit test package owner and current unit test package name.

Resolves: #1223
@jgebal jgebal self-assigned this Jun 8, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

    1 files    103 suites   3m 9s ⏱️
1 129 tests 1 125 ✅ 4 💤 0 ❌
1 133 runs  1 125 ✅ 8 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 7b0cc19.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.87%. Comparing base (3135d81) to head (7b0cc19).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1365   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    94.86%   94.87%           
========================================
  Files          111      111           
  Lines         5457     5459    +2     
  Branches        30       30           
========================================
+ Hits          5177     5179    +2     
  Misses         263      263           
  Partials        17       17           
Flag Coverage Δ
19se 94.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
21XE 95.00% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
23-free 94.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jgebal
jgebal merged commit c00a746 into develop Jun 9, 2026
15 checks passed
@jgebal
jgebal deleted the bugfix/throws_annotation_inconsistency branch June 9, 2026 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

--%throws annotation named package constant/variable not recognized

1 participant