enable strict_types in generator#481
Conversation
4426e97 to
724e515
Compare
|
awesome, thanks for all this. fyi, I would wait before merging new PRs, until the generator is fixed to get the code generator working before we proceed |
|
The generator is already working in my branch - these PRs are me trying to get us in-sync one small step at a time :) |
I see. do you think its possible to work on PRs which get the generator running first? |
|
Technically anything is possible with enough effort - but those changes are built on top of these ones, and I worry that trying to re-order the commits would cause more merge-conflicts with more potential to mess things up ^^;; |
|
I see. please leave a hint in the PRs so we can be sure they get merged in the correct order. thank you for your effort |
|
I'm sending them in dependency-based batches, so these self-contained foundations are safe to merge in parallel, in any order - then once the divergence between shish/safe and tcm/safe is as small as possible, we can focus more closely on the more significant behaviour-change diffs :3 |
(Continuing with pulling the changes from shish/safe into tcm/safe in small hopefully easy-to-review chunks)
|
thanks |
(Continuing with pulling the changes from shish/safe into tcm/safe in small hopefully easy-to-review chunks)