Skip to content

improvement(schema): centralize derivation of block schemas #3175

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
icecrasher321 merged 11 commits into from
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

improvement(schema): centralize derivation of block schemas #3175

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
089b8df
improvement(schema): centralize derivation of block schemas
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
606f0f3
address bugbot comments
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
b32d4e4
remove unused code
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
2ffdcb4
address greptile comments
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
34bdb4f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/staging' into improvement/schema…
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
f25505a
merge conflict resolution
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
454127f
fix
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
e1c5737
update tests
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
1e80633
address greptile comments
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
dd7111d
make evaluator metrics only
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
a7c92b9
return base and metrics for evaluator
icecrasher321 Feb 10, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
address greptile comments
  • Loading branch information
@icecrasher321
icecrasher321 committed Feb 10, 2026
commit 2ffdcb4e6cf582bc0429f7f3024cf4d4ba814b42
20 changes: 0 additions & 20 deletions apps/sim/lib/workflows/blocks/block-outputs.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -307,26 +307,6 @@ export function getBlockOutputs(
return getLegacyStarterOutputs(subBlocks)
}

if (blockType === 'agent') {
const responseFormatValue = subBlocks?.responseFormat?.value
if (responseFormatValue) {
const parsed = parseResponseFormatSafely(responseFormatValue, 'agent')
if (parsed) {
const fields = extractFieldsFromSchema(parsed)
if (fields.length > 0) {
const outputs: OutputDefinition = {}
for (const field of fields) {
outputs[field.name] = {
type: (field.type || 'any') as any,
description: field.description || `Field from Agent: ${field.name}`,
}
}
return outputs
}
}
}
}

const baseOutputs = { ...(blockConfig.outputs || {}) }
const filteredOutputs = filterOutputsByCondition(baseOutputs, subBlocks, includeHidden)
return applyInputFormatToOutputs(blockType, blockConfig, subBlocks, filteredOutputs)
Comment thread
icecrasher321 marked this conversation as resolved.
Expand Down