Skip to content

UI Enhancement: Revamp of footer #1772

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
sanjay-kv merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2026
Merged

UI Enhancement: Revamp of footer #1772

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f1d53d7
Revamp of footer
steam-bell-92 May 28, 2026
b471fdc
Apply suggestions from code review
Adez017 May 29, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions blog/google-icon-update/index.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ It's a phenomenon called cognitive friction. You have to stop searching for a re
:::

<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/05-google-new-logo.png)]()
![Github](./assets/05-google-new-logo.png)
Comment thread
Adez017 marked this conversation as resolved.
</BrowserWindow>

<span style={{color: 'red'}}>**So From when the issue started happening?**</span>
Expand All @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ It has been happening for five years. The four icons sit in my browser tab bar l

<span style={{color: 'green'}}> **The Solution**</span> If that sounds familiar, Google finally heard you. And me. And apparently everyone who has ever stared at a browser tab bar wondering which shade of blue-red-yellow-green meant Calendar versus Drive.
<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/01-New-Google-icon-Design.jpg)]()
![Github](./assets/01-New-Google-icon-Design.jpg)
</BrowserWindow>


Expand All @@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ At the time, the rebrand looked clean on paper. Google unified its entire app su

<div className="img-zoom">

[![Github](./assets/03-google-old-apps-logo.png)]()
![Github](./assets/03-google-old-apps-logo.png)

</div>

Within hours of the 2020 announcement, the internet responded with a very specific complaint: all the icons now look the same. The new Gmail icon was the most mocked. The classic envelope with a red M that everyone recognized was replaced with a four-color M that looked like a child's art project. People struggled to tell Calendar from Drive, Drive from Docs, and Meet from everything else at a glance.
<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/04-google-old-outline-logo.png)]()
![Github](./assets/04-google-old-outline-logo.png)
</BrowserWindow>

The complaint was not just aesthetic. It was functional. When apps share the same four colors and similar shapes, your brain cannot build distinct visual shortcuts for each one. You have to read the icon rather than recognize it. That adds cognitive friction dozens of times a day. Multiply that across 3 billion Google Workspace users and the accumulated frustration becomes significant.
Expand All @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ The practical reason is simple: they finally ran out of excuses not to fix it. T

The strategic reason is more interesting. Look at which Google products got gradient icons first before this Workspace rollout: the Google G logo, Gemini, Google Photos, Google Maps. Every product associated with <span style={{color: 'green'}}>**Google's AI push** </span>got gradients first. Applying the same design language to Workspace now visually ties the entire productivity suite to the AI narrative.
<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/08-google-old.png)]()
![Github](./assets/08-google-old.png)
</BrowserWindow>

Google I/O 2026 is happening this week. The timing of this rollout is not accidental. Google is walking into its biggest annual developer event with a refreshed product suite that looks modern, AI-adjacent, and ready for the next phase of Workspace. The icon redesign is as much a marketing signal as a usability fix.
Expand All @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ The strict four-color rule is gone. Instead of forcing every icon to carry all f

Looking at the new icons directly, here is what stands out:
<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/09-google-new-design.png)]()
![Github](./assets/09-google-new-design.png)
</BrowserWindow>

The icons are also physically larger in the launcher. Google removed the Workspace page container that previously boxed each icon in, giving more visual real estate to the icon shapes themselves.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ The core complaint for five years was that all the icons look the same. That com

What is not addressed is the deeper question of whether icon design is even the right layer to solve the problem at. The real confusion in a modern Google workflow is not which icon to click. It is which Google product to use for which task. Should this document live in Drive or Sites? Should this conversation happen in Chat or Gmail? Should this meeting be in Meet or Calendar notes?
<BrowserWindow url="https://github.com/recodehive/recode-website/issues" bodyStyle={{padding: 0}}>
[![Github](./assets/11-google-new-design-changes.jpg)]()
![Github](./assets/11-google-new-design-changes.jpg)
</BrowserWindow>

Icon legibility is a surface-level fix for a suite that has genuine overlap and redundancy problems underneath. The new icons will help you click the right app faster. They will not help you decide which app you actually need.
Expand Down
Loading
Loading