Add scikit-learn#153
Conversation
|
Awesome ! Thanks ! Feel free to ping any of us when you transition, read the practicalities section to make sure to use python_requires correctly (to not break for Python 2 users, and feel free to ping here if you need a pair of eyes on the Pr that drop 2.7. |
|
Thanks a lot for the review and suggestions ! |
|
cc @amueller @GaelVaroquax @ogrisel @jnothman - we generally ask project maintainers to agree on signing this statement, even if the project's release schedule is compatible with it. Some projects (like Django) have made Python-3-only releases but chosen not to sign the statement. In this case, scikit-learn already got added. Obviously we hope you'll leave it there - the statement is a more persuasive argument with more projects on board - but if you decide you'd rather not, please let us know. |
|
Extra cc @GaelVaroquaux because I misspelled his handle above. |
|
I think @rth is in a fine position to make the call ;) But for the record I think it's good to sign. |
|
+1 on what @amueller said. But it's fine to have a somewhat optimistic release timeline here. |
|
+1 as well. |
|
Thanks everyone. :-) |
Scikit-learn 0.20 is the latest release to support Python 2.7 (see scikit-learn/scikit-learn#11115 for more details).
scikit-learn 0.20-rc1 was released a few weeks ago, with the final release planned in the coming days. Assuming an (optimistic) 6 month release schedule, this means that the first python 3 only version will happen 6 month from now. The dates are somewhat approximate, but I think it's good enough.