Bot API 10.0: Chat Management#5230
Open
harshil21 wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds Bot API 10.0 “Chat Management” support to the library by introducing new reaction-deletion endpoints, extending admin retrieval to optionally include bots, and adding the new can_react_to_messages permission to relevant objects, along with corresponding test and documentation updates.
Changes:
- Add
delete_message_reaction/delete_all_message_reactionstoBot/ExtBotand new shortcut methods onChat,Message, andUser. - Extend
get_chat_administrators(andChat.get_administrators) with thereturn_botsparameter and adapt tests. - Add
can_react_to_messagestoChatPermissionsandChatMemberRestricted, updating serialization/equality tests and docs.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/test_user.py | Adds tests for new User reaction deletion shortcuts. |
| tests/test_message.py | Adds tests for new Message.delete_reaction shortcut. |
| tests/test_chatpermissions.py | Updates ChatPermissions tests for can_react_to_messages. |
| tests/test_chatmember.py | Updates ChatMemberRestricted tests for can_react_to_messages. |
| tests/test_chat.py | Adds tests for new Chat reaction deletion shortcuts. |
| tests/test_bot.py | Adds offline request-shape tests for new bot methods; updates get_chat_administrators test to use return_bots. |
| src/telegram/ext/_extbot.py | Plumbs return_bots and adds ExtBot wrappers + camelCase aliases for new endpoints. |
| src/telegram/_user.py | Fixes replace_token return docs; adds User reaction deletion shortcuts. |
| src/telegram/_message.py | Adds Message.delete_reaction shortcut. |
| src/telegram/_chatpermissions.py | Adds can_react_to_messages to model/equality and docs. |
| src/telegram/_chatmember.py | Adds can_react_to_messages to ChatMemberRestricted model/docs (with optional signature). |
| src/telegram/_chat.py | Adds return_bots to Chat.get_administrators; adds reaction deletion shortcuts. |
| src/telegram/_bot.py | Adds return_bots support for get_chat_administrators; adds new reaction deletion endpoints + aliases. |
| docs/source/inclusions/bot_methods.rst | Adds the new bot methods to the quick overview table. |
| changes/unreleased/5229.87PBN4GFkuAaDhhgFwCYkY.toml | Updates the unreleased changelog entry for Bot API 10.0 support. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/telegram/_bot.py:5154
- The return description still says that the result excludes other bots, but the new
return_botsparameter allows including them. Please update theReturns:text to describe both cases (default omits other bots;return_bots=Trueincludes them).
Returns:
tuple[:class:`telegram.ChatMember`]: On success, returns a tuple of ``ChatMember``
objects that contains information about all chat administrators except
other bots. If the chat is a group or a supergroup and no administrators were
appointed, only the creator will be returned.
aelkheir
requested changes
May 10, 2026
Member
aelkheir
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great! just two comments, and a shortcut for CallbackQuery would be nice.
| self.can_send_video_notes: bool = can_send_video_notes | ||
| self.can_send_voice_notes: bool = can_send_voice_notes | ||
| self.can_edit_tag: bool = can_edit_tag | ||
| self.can_react_to_messages: bool | None = can_react_to_messages |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| self.can_react_to_messages: bool | None = can_react_to_messages | |
| self.can_react_to_messages: bool = can_react_to_messages |
and raising TypeError when missing
| self, | ||
| chat_id: int | str, | ||
| message_id: int, | ||
| actor_chat_id: int | None = None, |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can actor_chat_id be removed from the signature? or you preferred not to intervene between users and Telegram
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yea I initially didn't have it on there, but then decided to keep it in since Telegram should be the one complaining about it
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.