ENH: optional suppression of ParserError for undecoded non-remark ele…#36
Merged
Merged
Conversation
akrherz
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2018
akrherz
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I am happy with this approach, anybody else watching wish to comment?
Collaborator
|
rebased and will see what travis now as to say prior to merging |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…ments
An alternative to #25
What I envision is the ability to adopt a more incremental parsing feature so that one can inquire what remains to be parsed and to invoke additional parsers, if needed. This would also make the library more useful as a finer-grained decoding library for those who are just looking to decode specific elements in their own text products that aren't METARS.