Skip to content

Add a YAML-parsing benchmark #342

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mdboom merged 4 commits into from
Dec 17, 2025
+102 −0
Merged

Add a YAML-parsing benchmark #342

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
379c047
Add a YAML-parsing benchmark
mdboom Jun 14, 2024
e3c590f
Fix description
mdboom Jun 14, 2024
b267db0
Update pyperformance/data-files/benchmarks/bm_yaml/run_benchmark.py
mdboom Jun 24, 2024
e322410
Merge branch 'main' into add-yaml-benchmark
hugovk Dec 17, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Update pyperformance/data-files/benchmarks/bm_yaml/run_benchmark.py 
Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
@mdboom @ericsnowcurrently
mdboom and ericsnowcurrently authored Jun 24, 2024
commit b267db00423acda93999f3cb19161975355c486b
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pyperformance/data-files/benchmarks/bm_yaml/run_benchmark.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Script for testing the performance of YAML parsing, using yaml.

This will dump/load several real world-representative objects a few thousand
times. The methodology below was chosen for was chosen to be similar to
times. The methodology below was chosen to be similar to
real-world scenarios which operate on single objects at a time.
Comment thread
mdboom marked this conversation as resolved.

This explicitly tests the pure Python implementation in pyyaml, not its C
Expand Down