bpo-33167: Updated RFC document descriptions to reflect the intention of the document#6289
Closed
agnosticdev wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
bpo-33167: Updated RFC document descriptions to reflect the intention of the document#6289agnosticdev wants to merge 2 commits into
agnosticdev wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Do I need to include a News entry for this documentation update? |
Contributor
Author
|
Just wanted to update this PR with some links for extra context: New URL API I am developing from ideas discussed on 33034: |
Contributor
Author
|
Wanted to check in and see if there was any feedback on this PR? |
Contributor
Author
|
Awaiting any information on this PR? |
Contributor
Author
|
PING on this PR. |
Contributor
Author
|
Closing PR due to being very outdated. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update to to urllib.parse documentation to better reflect the intention of the RFC documents.
The motivation for this PR occurred while reading the documentation for development of a new URL API discussed here: https://bugs.python.org/issue33034
https://bugs.python.org/issue33167