Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-45678: Add functools.singledispatchmethod tests (GH-29328)#29391

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-5a14929-3.9
Closed

[3.9] bpo-45678: Add functools.singledispatchmethod tests (GH-29328)#29391
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-5a14929-3.9

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 3, 2021 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit 5a14929)

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue45678

@AlexWaygood @miss-islington
bpo-45678: Add functools.singledispatchmethod tests (pythonGH-29328)
531de96 
(cherry picked from commit 5a14929)

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the tests Tests in the Lib/test dir label Nov 3, 2021
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Nov 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@AlexWaygood and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2021
Merged
@AlexWaygood

AlexWaygood commented Nov 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is fun! @ambv, it appears that attempting to backport these new tests to 3.9 has uncovered a bug in the 3.9 branch, where staticmethod and classmethod singledispatchmethods don't properly wrap the docstrings or names of the target function. Would the best course of action be to:

  1. Abandon backporting this to 3.9?
  2. Apply a bugfix along with the new tests to 3.9, linking to the same BPO issue?
  3. Create a new BPO issue for a bugfix?

@ambv

ambv commented Nov 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Definitely worth fixing. Since you're not a committer (yet?), you won't be able to patch this PR so you can essentially recreate it as part of the fix. The fix can be part of this same BPO.

@AlexWaygood

AlexWaygood commented Nov 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Definitely worth fixing. Since you're not a committer (yet?), you won't be able to patch this PR so you can essentially recreate it as part of the fix. The fix can be part of this same BPO.

Great, I'll get to work on a fix!

@ambv

ambv commented Nov 4, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing in favor of GH-29394.

@ambv ambv closed this Nov 4, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-5a14929-3.9 branch November 4, 2021 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rhettinger rhettinger Awaiting requested review from rhettinger rhettinger is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting review tests Tests in the Lib/test dir

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@miss-islington @AlexWaygood @ambv @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot