DOC: remove documentation for non-existing socket class attributes#28029
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Contributor
|
GH-28221 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
|
GH-28222 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2021
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2021
Contributor
|
Thanks for the fix, Matti! ✨ 🍰 ✨ |
ambv
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2021
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2021
The functions in question are available on the module-level only. (cherry picked from commit 34d82ce) Co-authored-by: Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The module-level functions
if_nameindex,if_nametoindexandif_indextonamewere documented as existing on the class.Does this qualify as a "small documentation fix" that needs no issue, or should I open a corresponding issue.
Note the documentation is a bit confusing since it is not clear that the
socketprefix here refers to the module, not the object. The object docs start a few lines down. So therstdocs need no fixes.