Skip to content

bpo-41410: Fix outdated info in mkstemp docs#21701

Merged
miss-islington merged 4 commits into
python:masterfrom
xrisk:mkstemp-docfix
Aug 14, 2020
Merged

bpo-41410: Fix outdated info in mkstemp docs#21701
miss-islington merged 4 commits into
python:masterfrom
xrisk:mkstemp-docfix

Conversation

@xrisk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xrisk xrisk commented Aug 2, 2020

Choosing to open a file in binary or text mode makes a difference
on *all* platforms since Python 3.x
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@xrisk

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericvsmith ericvsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small point about truthiness.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

And if you don't make the requested changes, you will be put in the comfy chair!

@xrisk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

xrisk commented Aug 2, 2020

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@ericvsmith I didn’t quite get what you. Is this what you meant?

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ericvsmith, @rhettinger: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericvsmith ericvsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When this small issue is addressed and the CLA is signed, we can merge this.

Comment thread Doc/library/tempfile.rst Outdated
@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@xrisk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

xrisk commented Aug 3, 2020

I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ericvsmith, @rhettinger: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot requested a review from ericvsmith August 3, 2020 04:29
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericvsmith ericvsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, thanks. Now it's just waiting on the CLA (Contributor License Agreement).

@xrisk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

xrisk commented Aug 7, 2020

Hi do I need to do anything else here?

@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @xrisk for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8, 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith
(cherry picked from commit e55de68)

Co-authored-by: Rishav Kundu <rk@rishav.io>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-21873 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-21874 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-21875 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith
(cherry picked from commit e55de68)

Co-authored-by: Rishav Kundu <rk@rishav.io>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith
(cherry picked from commit e55de68)

Co-authored-by: Rishav Kundu <rk@rishav.io>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith
(cherry picked from commit e55de68)

Co-authored-by: Rishav Kundu <rk@rishav.io>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith
(cherry picked from commit e55de68)

Co-authored-by: Rishav Kundu <rk@rishav.io>
@xrisk xrisk deleted the mkstemp-docfix branch August 14, 2020 03:57
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
xzy3 pushed a commit to xzy3/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants