Skip to content

gh-91279: Note SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr() #139396

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
vstinner merged 10 commits into from
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

gh-91279: Note SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr() #139396

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
89dea0b
gh-123299: Copyedit What's New in 3.14
Wulian233 Sep 28, 2025
fa92f66
Update 3.14.rst
Wulian233 Oct 3, 2025
764aadf
Update 3.14.rst
Wulian233 Oct 3, 2025
28b6b6c
Update 3.14.rst
Wulian233 Oct 3, 2025
feec370
Update 3.14.rst
Wulian233 Oct 3, 2025
c4ce0c6
Update zipfile.rst
Wulian233 Oct 7, 2025
217b831
Update Doc/library/zipfile.rst
Wulian233 Nov 4, 2025
98f4a10
Merge branch 'main' into doc
Wulian233 Dec 15, 2025
afb06e9
Update Doc/library/zipfile.rst
vstinner Mar 20, 2026
ba69427
Merge branch 'main' into doc
vstinner Mar 20, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Update 3.14.rst
  • Loading branch information
@Wulian233
Wulian233 authored Oct 3, 2025
commit feec370c13d57938741d848deb93fc36f6e85795
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions Doc/whatsnew/3.14.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -943,8 +943,9 @@ For further information on how to build Python, see
Clang/LLVM 19, which causes the normal interpreter to be slower. We were unaware of this bug,
resulting in inaccurate results. We sincerely apologize for
communicating results that were only accurate for LLVM v19.1.x and v20.1.0. In the meantime,
the bug has been fixed in LLVM v20.1.1 and v21.1, but it will remain unfixed for LLVM v19.1.x
and v20.1.0. Thus any benchmarks with those versions of LLVM may produce inaccurate numbers.
the bug has been fixed in LLVM v20.1.1 and for the upcoming v21.1, but it will remain
unfixed for LLVM v19.1.x and v20.1.0. Thus
any benchmarks with those versions of LLVM may produce inaccurate numbers.
(Thanks to Nelson Elhage for bringing this to light.)

(Contributed by Ken Jin in :gh:`128563`, with ideas on how to implement this
Expand Down
Loading