Skip to content

bpo-36373: Deprecate explicit loop parameter in all public asyncio APIs [locks]#13920

Merged
miss-islington merged 5 commits into
python:masterfrom
eamanu:bpo-36373-lock
Sep 10, 2019
Merged

bpo-36373: Deprecate explicit loop parameter in all public asyncio APIs [locks]#13920
miss-islington merged 5 commits into
python:masterfrom
eamanu:bpo-36373-lock

Conversation

@eamanu

@eamanu eamanu commented Jun 8, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs

This issues is split to be easier to review.

Third step: locks.py

https://bugs.python.org/issue36373

Automerge-Triggered-By: @asvetlov

This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs

This issues is split to be easier to review.

Third step: locks.py
@eamanu

eamanu commented Jun 9, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Please don't merge because ./python -Werror -m test -v test_asyncio is fallling

@eamanu eamanu requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner June 10, 2019 22:28
@eamanu

eamanu commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@asvetlov I think this PR is ready now

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ran 2153 tests in 81.037s

OK (skipped=35)
test_asyncio passed in 1 min 21 sec

== Tests result: SUCCESS ==

1 test OK.

Total duration: 1 min 21 sec
Tests result: SUCCESS

@eamanu

eamanu commented Jun 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ping @asvetlov :-)

@eamanu

eamanu commented Aug 5, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ping @asvetlov

@asvetlov asvetlov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Sorry for the delay.
Thank for your patience.

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @eamanu for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm having trouble backporting to 3.8. Reason: 'Error 110 while writing to socket. Connection timed out.'. Please retry by removing and re-adding the needs backport to 3.8 label.

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @eamanu for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
…Is [locks] (pythonGH-13920)

This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs

This issues is split to be easier to review.

Third step: locks.py

https://bugs.python.org/issue36373
(cherry picked from commit 537877d)

Co-authored-by: Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-15835 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
…Is [locks] (GH-13920)

This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs

This issues is split to be easier to review.

Third step: locks.py

https://bugs.python.org/issue36373
(cherry picked from commit 537877d)

Co-authored-by: Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>
websurfer5 pushed a commit to websurfer5/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
…PIs [locks] (pythonGH-13920)

This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs

This issues is split to be easier to review.

Third step: locks.py





https://bugs.python.org/issue36373
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants