-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.5k
gh-107265: Remove all ENTER_EXECUTOR when execute _Py_Instrument #108539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 11 commits
23e1f48
8820df8
e015f14
7612b8e
7d38c77
a01354d
9a631d7
7e81bf0
162a870
05773f9
9ddbfe7
1199dfe
1232432
e051be1
4a0be4d
bc251b5
83d8829
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1698,3 +1698,31 @@ def run(): | |
| self.assertEqual(caught, "inner") | ||
| finally: | ||
| sys.monitoring.set_events(TEST_TOOL, 0) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class TestOptimizer(MonitoringTestBase, unittest.TestCase): | ||
|
|
||
| def setUp(self): | ||
| import _testinternalcapi | ||
| self.old_opt = _testinternalcapi.get_optimizer() | ||
| opt = _testinternalcapi.get_counter_optimizer() | ||
| _testinternalcapi.set_optimizer(opt) | ||
| super(TestOptimizer, self).setUp() | ||
|
|
||
| def tearDown(self): | ||
| import _testinternalcapi | ||
| super(TestOptimizer, self).tearDown() | ||
| _testinternalcapi.set_optimizer(self.old_opt) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_for_loop(self): | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd like @markshannon to review this part at least. |
||
| def test_func(x): | ||
| i = 0 | ||
| while i < x: | ||
| i += 1 | ||
|
|
||
| code = test_func.__code__ | ||
| sys.monitoring.set_local_events(TEST_TOOL, code, E.PY_START) | ||
| self.assertEqual(sys.monitoring.get_local_events(TEST_TOOL, code), E.PY_START) | ||
| test_func(1000) | ||
| sys.monitoring.set_local_events(TEST_TOOL, code, 0) | ||
| self.assertEqual(sys.monitoring.get_local_events(TEST_TOOL, code), 0) | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ | |
| #include "opcode_ids.h" | ||
|
|
||
| #include "pycore_call.h" | ||
| #include "pycore_code.h" // _PyCode_Clear_Executors() | ||
| #include "pycore_frame.h" | ||
| #include "pycore_interp.h" | ||
| #include "pycore_long.h" | ||
|
|
@@ -566,13 +567,7 @@ de_instrument(PyCodeObject *code, int i, int event) | |
| _Py_CODEUNIT *instr = &_PyCode_CODE(code)[i]; | ||
| uint8_t *opcode_ptr = &instr->op.code; | ||
| int opcode = *opcode_ptr; | ||
| if (opcode == ENTER_EXECUTOR) { | ||
| int oparg = instr->op.arg; | ||
| _PyExecutorObject *exec = code->co_executors->executors[oparg]; | ||
| opcode_ptr = &exec->vm_data.opcode; | ||
| opcode = *opcode_ptr; | ||
| assert(opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| } | ||
| assert(opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| if (opcode == INSTRUMENTED_LINE) { | ||
| opcode_ptr = &code->_co_monitoring->lines[i].original_opcode; | ||
| opcode = *opcode_ptr; | ||
|
|
@@ -717,22 +712,7 @@ remove_tools(PyCodeObject * code, int offset, int event, int tools) | |
| assert(event != PY_MONITORING_EVENT_LINE); | ||
| assert(event != PY_MONITORING_EVENT_INSTRUCTION); | ||
| assert(PY_MONITORING_IS_INSTRUMENTED_EVENT(event)); | ||
| #ifndef NDEBUG | ||
| _Py_CODEUNIT co_instr = _PyCode_CODE(code)[offset]; | ||
| uint8_t opcode = co_instr.op.code; | ||
| uint8_t oparg = co_instr.op.arg; | ||
| if (opcode == ENTER_EXECUTOR) { | ||
| _PyExecutorObject *exec = code->co_executors->executors[oparg]; | ||
| assert(exec->vm_data.opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| opcode = _PyOpcode_Deopt[exec->vm_data.opcode]; | ||
| opcode = exec->vm_data.oparg; | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| opcode = _Py_GetBaseOpcode(code, offset); | ||
| } | ||
| assert(opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| assert(opcode_has_event(opcode)); | ||
| #endif | ||
| assert(opcode_has_event(_Py_GetBaseOpcode(code, offset))); | ||
| _PyCoMonitoringData *monitoring = code->_co_monitoring; | ||
| if (monitoring && monitoring->tools) { | ||
| monitoring->tools[offset] &= ~tools; | ||
|
|
@@ -1303,27 +1283,21 @@ initialize_tools(PyCodeObject *code) | |
| for (int i = 0; i < code_len; i++) { | ||
| _Py_CODEUNIT *instr = &_PyCode_CODE(code)[i]; | ||
| int opcode = instr->op.code; | ||
| int oparg = instr->op.arg; | ||
| if (opcode == ENTER_EXECUTOR) { | ||
| _PyExecutorObject *exec = code->co_executors->executors[oparg]; | ||
| opcode = exec->vm_data.opcode; | ||
| oparg = exec->vm_data.oparg; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (opcode == INSTRUMENTED_LINE) { | ||
| if (opcode == INSTRUMENTED_LINE) { | ||
| opcode = code->_co_monitoring->lines[i].original_opcode; | ||
| } | ||
| assert(opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| bool instrumented = is_instrumented(opcode); | ||
| if (instrumented) { | ||
| opcode = DE_INSTRUMENT[opcode]; | ||
| assert(opcode != 0); | ||
| } | ||
| assert(opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It was added to test #107265 (comment)
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe the test could reproduce what you did in that comment? |
||
| opcode = _PyOpcode_Deopt[opcode]; | ||
| if (opcode_has_event(opcode)) { | ||
| if (instrumented) { | ||
| int8_t event; | ||
| if (opcode == RESUME) { | ||
| event = oparg != 0; | ||
| event = instr->op.arg != 0; | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| event = EVENT_FOR_OPCODE[opcode]; | ||
|
|
@@ -1576,7 +1550,9 @@ _Py_Instrument(PyCodeObject *code, PyInterpreterState *interp) | |
| ); | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
| int code_len = (int)Py_SIZE(code); | ||
| if (code->co_executors != NULL) { | ||
| _PyCode_Clear_Executors(code); | ||
|
gvanrossum marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
| } | ||
| if (update_instrumentation_data(code, interp)) { | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -1605,10 +1581,12 @@ _Py_Instrument(PyCodeObject *code, PyInterpreterState *interp) | |
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
| /* Insert instrumentation */ | ||
| int code_len = (int)Py_SIZE(code); | ||
| for (int i = code->_co_firsttraceable; i < code_len; i+= _PyInstruction_GetLength(code, i)) { | ||
| _Py_CODEUNIT *instr = &_PyCode_CODE(code)[i]; | ||
| CHECK(instr->op.code != 0); | ||
| int base_opcode = _Py_GetBaseOpcode(code, i); | ||
| assert(base_opcode != ENTER_EXECUTOR); | ||
| if (opcode_has_event(base_opcode)) { | ||
| int8_t event; | ||
| if (base_opcode == RESUME) { | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markshannon cc @gvanrossum
I added a test, but not sure what you wanted :)
Without this PR, Python/instrumentation.c#L1589 will not be able to pass the assert through this test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this test supposed to do? When I copy this test into the main branch, it passes (in debug mode, so failing asserts would cause crashes), so I don't think this proves your fix works.
By adding some
dis.dis(test_func, adaptive=True)calls to the test I think I see the difference -- in main, an ENTER_EXECUTOR opcode remains in the code object, whereas with this PR, the ENTER_EXECUTOR opcode appears after the function is called, but disappears again after the second set_local_events call.You could check for that ENTER_EXECUTOR (there are examples in test_capi/test_misc.py) but it would be nice if you had example code that actually crashed or triggered an assert (in debug mode) in main without your fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm,, interesting, It looks like I watched the Hallucination when I wrote the test in the first place :(
I will soon update the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See: #108539 (comment)