Skip to content

Fix inaccuracies in "Assorted Topics" section of "Defining Extension Types" tutorial #104969

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kumaraditya303 merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023
Merged

Fix inaccuracies in "Assorted Topics" section of "Defining Extension Types" tutorial #104969

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
88e707d
Fix inaccuracies in "Assorted Topics" section of "Defining Extension …
chgnrdv May 26, 2023
113d6cf
fixed names in richcmp signature
chgnrdv May 26, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
fixed names in richcmp signature
  • Loading branch information
@chgnrdv
chgnrdv committed May 26, 2023
commit 113d6cf19263436328e23d28e5517c21b0c6c583
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/extending/newtypes.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ Here is a sample implementation, for a datatype that is considered equal if the
size of an internal pointer is equal::

static PyObject *
newdatatype_richcmp(newdatatypeobj *obj1, newdatatypeobj *obj2, int op)
newdatatype_richcmp(newdatatypeobject *obj1, newdatatypeobject *obj2, int op)
{
PyObject *result;
int c, size1, size2;
Expand Down