BPO | [46446](https://bugs.python.org/issue46446) --- | :--- Nosy | @kmosiejczuk PRs | python/cpython#30721 *Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.* Show more details GitHub fields: ```python assignee = None closed_at = None created_at = labels = ['build', '3.9', '3.10'] title = 'OpenBSD not MULTIARCH' updated_at = user = 'https://github.com/kmosiejczuk' ``` bugs.python.org fields: ```python activity = actor = 'kmosiejczuk' assignee = 'none' closed = False closed_date = None closer = None components = ['Build'] creation = creator = 'kmosiejczuk' dependencies = [] files = [] hgrepos = [] issue_num = 46446 keywords = ['patch'] message_count = 1.0 messages = ['411032'] nosy_count = 1.0 nosy_names = ['kmosiejczuk'] pr_nums = ['30721'] priority = 'normal' resolution = None stage = 'patch review' status = 'open' superseder = None type = 'compile error' url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue46446' versions = ['Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10'] ```
Activity
kmosiejczuk commentedon Jan 20, 2022
Just like FreeBSD, MULTIARCH should not be passed to OpenBSD.
Just add another line like done for FreeBSD
StanFromIreland commentedon Sep 28, 2025
The PR was closed, I don't know if there is anything to do here then?
encukou commentedon Feb 13, 2026
The PR looks good, but I don't think we need the issue -- an task in CPython's TODO list -- kept open.
(FWIW, merging a PR for a closed issue would not be a problem.)