Skip to content

os.path.exists() takes bool as argument and returns True #82626

Closed

Description

@Nika
mannequin
BPO 38445
Nosy @serhiy-storchaka, @eryksun, @rmariano

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/serhiy-storchaka'
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2019-10-11.11:16:42.144>
labels = ['3.10', 'type-bug', '3.9', 'expert-IO']
title = 'os.path.exists() takes bool as argument and returns True'
updated_at = <Date 2020-09-22.06:20:54.283>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/Nika'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2020-09-22.06:20:54.283>
actor = 'serhiy.storchaka'
assignee = 'serhiy.storchaka'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['IO']
creation = <Date 2019-10-11.11:16:42.144>
creator = 'Nika'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 38445
keywords = []
message_count = 8.0
messages = ['354440', '354443', '354444', '354481', '354495', '354510', '354514', '377303']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['serhiy.storchaka', 'eryksun', 'Mariano Anaya', 'Nika']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue38445'
versions = ['Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10']

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. Nika commented on Oct 11, 2019

    Nikamannequin
    MannequinAuthor

    os.path.exists() accepts either True or False as argument and returns True.
    Reproducible on Windows, e. g., in jupyter notebook or in Eclipse, although not in IDLE, which returns False, as expected.

    import os
    print(os.path.exists(False))
  2. added
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    on Oct 11, 2019
  3. rmariano commented on Oct 11, 2019

    rmarianomannequin
    Mannequin

    Hi, I would like to take a look at this issue. Could someone please assign it to me? Thanks

  4. eryksun commented on Oct 11, 2019

    @eryksun
    Contributor

    Note that the underlying stat call supports file descriptors, which are non-negative integers. This is a supported and tested capability for genericpath.exists (see GenericTest.test_exists_fd in Lib/test/test_genericpath.py).

    False and True are integers with the values 0 and 1:

        >>> issubclass(bool, int)
        True
        >>> False + 0
        0
        >>> True + 0
        1

    That can be useful, but there may be cases where we don't want to conflate bools and integers. IMO, a bool should not be supported as a file descriptor. It's likely a bug that should be caught early instead of meaninglessly propagated.

    A high-level solution would check for bool instances in genericpath.exists. A low-level solution, to make this policy consistent in general, would be to modify _fd_converter in Modules/posixmodule.c to disallow bool instances.

  5. serhiy-storchaka commented on Oct 11, 2019

    @serhiy-storchaka
    Member

    Eryk, I think testing for bool in _fd_converter and issuing a warning is a good idea. Do you want to create a PR?

  6. vstinner commented on Oct 11, 2019

    @vstinner
    Member

    Maybe os.fspath() can be used:

    >>> os.fspath(True)
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not bool
  7. taleinat commented on Oct 11, 2019

    @taleinat
    Contributor

    Mariano Anaya, you're welcome to work on this and create a PR.

    There's no need to have this issue assigned to you: feel free to just begin working. Anyone reading this will know that you intended to work on this.

    (FYI, we only assign issues to core developers, and assigning means something slightly different than "who is working on this.")

  8. eryksun commented on Oct 12, 2019

    @eryksun
    Contributor

    Maybe os.fspath() can be used

    I think that would already be the case if genericpath.exists didn't have to support file descriptors. It's documented that the path argument "refers to an existing path or an open file descriptor".

    Modifying _fd_converter would provide consistent behavior for all calls that ultimately use argument clinic's path_t(allow_fd=True) and/or dir_fd. Serhiy's suggestion to raise a warning sounds good.

    Here are some examples that currently pass silently in Linux:

    >>> os.chown(False, 1000, 1000)
    >>> os.chmod(False, 0o666)
    >>> os.utime(False, (1500000000, 1500000000))
    

    Probably os.fstat and other "f" functions (e.g. fstatvfs, fchdir, fchown, fchmod, ftruncate, fdatasync, fsync, and fpathconf) should also raise a warning when passed a bool. For example, the following would raise a warning instead of passing silently:

        >>> os.fstat(False).st_size
        0

    These cases could be addressed by consistently using an argument clinic type. Some of them already us the fildes type (e.g. fchdir, fsync, fdatasync). However, fildes_converter calls PyObject_AsFileDescriptor, which also supports objects with a fileno() method. That's documented behavior for PyObject_AsFileDescriptor, but nothing in the documentation of fchdir, fsync, and fdatasync suggests to me that they support objects with a fileno() method:

        >>> os.fchdir(sys.stdin)
        Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
        NotADirectoryError: [Errno 20] Not a directory

    If not for this behavior, we could simply change all of the "f" functions to use the fildes type.

    PyObject_AsFileDescriptor is used in various other places as well, such as the select module. In the latter case, supporting objects with a fileno() method is clearly documented.

    Also consider including open() and os.fdopen by modifying _io_open_impl in Modules/_io/_iomodule.c. For example:

       >>> open(False, closefd=False)
        <_io.TextIOWrapper name=False mode='r' encoding='UTF-8'>

    Currently it calls PyNumber_Check(file). If true, a warning could be raised if PyBool_Check(file) is also true.

  9. serhiy-storchaka commented on Sep 22, 2020

    @serhiy-storchaka
    Member

    It is a large change, so I take it.

  10. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 24, 2023
  12. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 5, 2024
  13. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 14, 2024
  14. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 3, 2026
  15. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions