Skip to content

pathlib: "Incorrect function" during resolve() #76023

Closed

Description

@earonesty
mannequin
BPO 31842
Nosy @pfmoore, @tjguk, @zware, @eryksun, @zooba, @earonesty, @earonesty, @zombie110year, @christopher.pickering

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2017-10-22.21:31:13.027>
labels = ['type-bug', '3.9', 'OS-windows']
title = 'pathlib: "Incorrect function" during resolve()'
updated_at = <Date 2021-11-13.12:33:39.598>
user = 'https://github.com/earonesty'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2021-11-13.12:33:39.598>
actor = 'eryksun'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Windows']
creation = <Date 2017-10-22.21:31:13.027>
creator = 'earonesty2'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 31842
keywords = []
message_count = 8.0
messages = ['304767', '356199', '357702', '357725', '381676', '390089', '406212', '406274']
nosy_count = 11.0
nosy_names = ['paul.moore', 'tim.golden', 'zach.ware', 'eryksun', 'steve.dower', 'earonesty', 'earonesty2', 'zombie110year', 'maciozo', 'christopherpickering', 'riffitos']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue31842'
versions = ['Python 3.9']

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. earonesty commented on Oct 22, 2017

    earonestymannequin
    MannequinAuthor

    When strict is "false", pathlib should not fail if the network share is inaccessible. It should, as documented, catch the exception and continue with as much of the path as it has.

    >>> pathlib.Path("v:").resolve()
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\pathlib.py", line 1119, in resolve
        s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
      File "C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\pathlib.py", line 193, in resolve
        s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
    OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'v:'
  2. maciozo commented on Nov 7, 2019

    maciozomannequin
    Mannequin

    Same error occurs when attempting to resolve a path on an ImDisk RAM disk:

    >>> pathlib.Path("T:\\").resolve()
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
      File "C:\Users\maciozo\AppData\Local\Continuum\miniconda3\envs\brainboxes\lib\pathlib.py", line 1151, in resolve
        s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
      File "C:\Users\maciozo\AppData\Local\Continuum\miniconda3\envs\brainboxes\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
        s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
    OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'T:\\'
  3. Zombie110year commented on Dec 2, 2019

    Zombie110yearmannequin
    Mannequin

    Same Error.

    It happend by resolving a path which is not under C: driver,
    in Windows System.

    >>> Path().resolve()
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 1159, in resolve
        s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
      File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
        s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
    OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: '.'
    >>> Path().absolute()
    WindowsPath('R:/fileshare/fileshare-s')
    >>> Path().absolute().resolve()
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 1159, in resolve
        s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
      File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
        s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
    OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'R:\\fileshare\\fileshare-s'
  4. eryksun commented on Dec 2, 2019

    @eryksun
    Contributor

    When strict is "false", pathlib should not fail if the network
    share is inaccessible.

    A redirected filesystem (i.e. a share, whether local or remote) that's physically inaccessible should fail with a FileNotFoundError -- due to underlying errors such as ERROR_BAD_NETPATH (53) or ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME (67). This case is already handled by resolve() in non-strict mode. But error handling for other cases does need to be expanded.

    A PermissionError should be ignored, from OS errors such as ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (5), ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION (32), and ERROR_NOT_READY (21).

    It should ignore errors due to bad reparse points (e.g. filesystem symlinks and mount points), such as ERROR_INVALID_REPARSE_DATA (4392) and ERROR_REPARSE_TAG_INVALID (4393).

    The resolve() method is supposed to raise a RuntimeError for a symlink loop (i.e. reparse loop). In Windows, the system detects this case as ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME (1921). It's not necessarily due to a reparse loop, but in practice it usually is. (It's actually due to the upper limit for the number of reparse attempts, which as of Windows 10 is no more than 63 attempts.) Maybe this error should be re-raised as a RuntimeError for the sake of compatibility with the POSIX implementation.

    The above-mentioned cases are all due to WINAPI CreateFileW failing.
    Additionally, the GetFinalPathNameByHandleW call in nt._getfinalpathname relies on several low-level system calls, any one of which can fail with ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION (1) or ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER (87) -- and possibly ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED (50). These errors should be ignored in non-strict mode.

    At a lower level, the reliability of nt._getfinalpathname could be improved for non-strict operation. It could fall back on other forms of the final name that may be supported. It could try FILE_NAME_OPENED instead of FILE_NAME_NORMALIZED to handle a filesystem that does not support normalizing 8.3 short names as long names. Try VOLUME_NAME_GUID instead of VOLUME_NAME_DOS to handle a volume that only has a GUID name (i.e. a volume device that's registered with the mount-point manager but lacks a DOS drive name or even a mountpoint on a volume that has a DOS drive name). Try VOLUME_NAME_NT to handle legacy volume/filesystem devices ('legacy' because they do not support the mount-point manager interface that was introduced almost 20 years ago in NT 5). For the sake of simplicity and performance, the latter case could be limited to well-known DOS device names such as r"\\?\PIPE" -> r"\Device\NamedPipe". The NT device path for the comparison should be queried instead of hard coded, e.g. via QueryDosDeviceW(L"PIPE", ...).

  5. christopherpickering commented on Nov 23, 2020

    christopherpickeringmannequin
    Mannequin

    Hi, is there a status update on this issue? Thanks!

  6. riffitos commented on Apr 2, 2021

    riffitosmannequin
    Mannequin

    Still happening on Python 3.9.2 on Win10 when using a Ram Drive.

    Any chance of getting this fixed?

  7. earonesty commented on Nov 12, 2021

    earonestymannequin
    MannequinAuthor

    bug is worse than that:

    perfectly valid redirected paths (winfsp ram drives for example) now break in python 3.9.6 (maybe fixed in later version?)

    >>> import pathlib
    >>> p=pathlib.Path('C:\\Users\\erik\\Atakama')
    >>> p.resolve()
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "c:\users\erik\.pyenv\pyenv-win\versions\3.9.6\Lib\pathlib.py", line 1205, in resolve
        s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
      File "c:\users\erik\.pyenv\pyenv-win\versions\3.9.6\Lib\pathlib.py", line 206, in resolve
        s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
    OSError: [WinError 1005] The volume does not contain a recognized file system.

    ... yet....

    dir 'C:\\Users\\erik\\Atakama'
    Desktop.ini Personal\ Files Vault

    mounted via winfsp

  8. eryksun commented on Nov 13, 2021

    @eryksun
    Contributor

    perfectly valid redirected paths (winfsp ram drives for example)

    I mounted a WinFsp MEMFS filesystem on a directory, which set a mountpoint that targets the root path of a volume device in the native "\Device" object directory. It didn't create a volume GUID name, which means the mountpoint manager isn't supported in this configuration.

    The error code ERROR_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME (1005) is meaningless in this case. The mountpoint manager queries a volume with IOCTLs such as IOCTL_MOUNTDEV_QUERY_DEVICE_NAME, which the WinFsp virtual volume (in the above configuration) doesn't support. Weirdly, it returns the error code STATUS_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME instead of STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST. It does this as a lazy workaround for various IOCTLs it receives from filesystem drivers while the volume is in the process of being mounted [1][2]. The side effect is that it returns STATUS_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME for unhandled IOCTLs even when it's not getting mounted. This behavior should have been restricted to when the volume parameter block (VPB) is unmounted. Otherwise it should return the expected error code STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST (i.e. ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION) instead of confusing users with a meaningless error.

    WinFsp does support the mountpoint manager, in a restricted fashion. The mount target has to be a drive device name in the form "\.\X:". This gets registered with the mountpoint manager as the canonical DOS name of the volume. Since it's a global name, administrator access is required. It also creates a GUID volume name. Run mountvol.exe without arguments to find the volume name that's associated with the drive letter. Then run it again as mountvol <path> <volume_name>, where is an empty directory on which to mount the volume. Note that Python's os.path.realpath() will resolve the volume to the canonical drive name, even if the path traverses a directory mountpoint for the volume.

    A new issue should be created to ignore ERROR_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME in 3.10+, for which Path.resolve() was updated to call os.path.realpath(). For 3.9, fixing Path.resolve() is still possible. There are 3 remaining bug releases planned: 3.9.9: (2022-01-03), 3.9.10 (2022-02-28), and 3.9.11 (2022-05-02).

    ---
    [1] https://github.com/billziss-gh/winfsp/blob/v1.9/src/sys/devctl.c#L49
    [2] winfsp/winfsp#177

  9. 3 remaining items

  10. traits commented on Oct 29, 2022

    @traits

    We are using symbolic names (example: <XYZ>/my.fil), so these files never exist in literal form. I would still expect from the documentation (3.10):

    If the path doesn’t exist and strict is True, FileNotFoundError is raised. If strict is False, the path is resolved as far as possible and any remainder is appended without checking whether it exists. If an infinite loop is encountered along the resolution path, RuntimeError is raised.

    that only two types of exceptions are possible: FileNotFoundError and RuntimeError, for strict==False only the second one. But we still get an OSError in this case:

    OSError: [WinError 123] The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect: '<XYZ>\my.fil'

    OSError is a base class of FileNotFoundError, but not raised as the latter, but as a real OSError. It shouldn't do it in either case, because as mentioned for strict==False only RuntimeError should be allowed. And only for specific circumstances, otherwise the documentation suggests a noop/partial string resolve regarding the input.

  11. zooba commented on Oct 31, 2022

    @zooba
    Member

    I don't think any Python documentation exhaustively lists exceptions. There are some that are always possible dependent on the arguments passed (ValueError, TypeError, etc.) and others dependent on state outside of the caller's control (OSError, KeyboardInterrupt, etc.). So to a certain extent, your expectation is wrong, and that's the fault of the documentation for not making that more obvious.

    We'd welcome a pull request to add that particular error code into the "assume the path is correct and don't check" codepath pointed out in an earlier response.

  12. barneygale commented on Nov 22, 2023

    @barneygale
    Contributor

    I'm removing the topic-pathlib tag because in Python 3.13+, pathlib.Path.resolve() calls straight through to os.path.realpath(). If this bug still exists, it's in realpath() and not pathlib.

    cpython/Lib/pathlib.py

    Lines 1437 to 1443 in 1619f43

    def resolve(self, strict=False):
    """
    Make the path absolute, resolving all symlinks on the way and also
    normalizing it.
    """
    return self.with_segments(os.path.realpath(self, strict=strict))

  13. added
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    on Nov 29, 2023
  14. added a commit that references this issue on May 19, 2025
  15. added 2 commits that reference this issue on May 19, 2025
  16. serhiy-storchaka commented on May 19, 2025

    @serhiy-storchaka
    Member

    Why not ignore all errors in non-strict mode, like on Posix?

  17. added 2 commits that reference this issue on May 19, 2025
  18. added a commit that references this issue on Jul 12, 2025
  19. added a commit that references this issue on Aug 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    OS-windowsstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions