Fix missing check for xmlTextWriterEndElement#10324
Closed
ndossche wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
xmlTextWriterEndElement returns -1 if the call fails. There was already a check for retval, but the return value wasn't assigned to retval. The other caller of xmlTextWriterEndElement is in xmlwriter_write_element_ns, which does the check correctly.
Girgias
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
xmlTextWriterEndElement returns -1 if the call fails. There was already a check for retval, but the return value wasn't assigned to retval. The other caller of xmlTextWriterEndElement is in xmlwriter_write_element_ns, which does the check correctly.
Full disclosure:
This bug was found using my own-developed (experimental) static analysis tool, which reported the missing check. I manually verified this bug report by doing code review as well. After applying this patch, my analyser no
longer reports this bug.