doc: add missing added entry for fs.lchmod - #65290
Closed
ashrees wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
The YAML history blocks for fs.lchmod and fs.lchmodSync only recorded the deprecation version (v0.4.7), with no added entry. Per doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_ARCHIVE.md, fs.lchmod was introduced in v0.5.0 (2011-07-05, nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#853). Refs: nodejs#65280
Contributor
|
Duplicate of #65283 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The YAML history blocks for
fs.lchmodandfs.lchmodSynconly recorded the deprecation version, with no indication of when the API was introduced (see #65280).Per
doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_ARCHIVE.md,fs.lchmodwas introduced in v0.5.0 (2011-07-05: "add fs.lchow, fs.lchmod, fs.fchmod, fs.fchown", nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#853).Note: the existing
deprecated: v0.4.7predates the introduction; I left it untouched to keep this PR minimal, but it may deserve a follow-up look.Doc-only change; no tests added.
Refs: #65280