doc: correct util.inspect null-prototype example - #65187
Closed
arhxam wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
The example omitted the null-prototype prefix that util.inspect() emits before Symbol.toStringTag. Update the expected output so it matches the current source-built runtime. Signed-off-by: Arham Wani <arhamwani765@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The
util.inspect()example for an object created withObject.create(null)shows the output as
'[foo] {}'. Currentutil.inspect()identifies the nullprototype before the
Symbol.toStringTagvalue and returns:[Object: null prototype] [foo] {}This updates the example so readers can compare it with the actual output.
Documentation-only change.