-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35.4k
util: recover from maximum call stack size #20725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
util: recover from maximum call stack size
Using util.inspect should still return values in case the maximum call stack size is reached. This is important to inspect linked lists and similar.
- Loading branch information
commit ef4e8d39457ab6a1e62918e89982405e68e3ff57
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t think we should be printing this warning, it’s not a good idea to have side effects (especially unexpected) like stdio coming from
util.inspect().There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without the warning though, it would completely be silent and users would very likely not realize this at all. I guess it would not really be important / bad in this case but I believe it would be good to provide some kind of notification about it and I can not think of any alternative right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@BridgeAR Can we add this to the output instead? That seems to make more sense to me, e.g. changing in the line below from
[${constructor || tag || 'Object'}]to[${constructor || tag || 'Object'}: Maximum call stack size exceeded]?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that is a viable solution. Should we maybe even be more verbose by writing e.g.,
[...: Inspection interrupted prematurely. Maximum call stack size exceeded.]?I also think about adding the actually reached depth. Opinions about that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@BridgeAR Seems fine to me, yup.
I wouldn’t expect it to be helpful a lot of the time (because that kind of nesting usually implies some kind of self-similar structure, so exact nesting levels are irrelevant), but it’s also not like it’s terrible information to include. 🤷