Skip to content

cluster: Add support to cluster to work with `NODE_OPTIONS="--inspect" #19165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sameer-coder wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

cluster: Add support to cluster to work with `NODE_OPTIONS="--inspect" #19165

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
19c4ec3
cluster: Add support to cluster to work with NODE_OPTIONS="--inspect"
sameer-coder Mar 6, 2018
ac832ab
cluster: Added test which spawns multiple workers for cluster to …
sameer-coder Mar 7, 2018
eb8f567
cluster: Changed multi-line template string in test-inspect-support-f…
sameer-coder Mar 8, 2018
ff81da0
cluster: spawning multiple workers in test-inspect-support-for-node_o…
sameer-coder Mar 16, 2018
d2cf4a4
cluster: Using common.mustCall to wrap callback in test-inspect-suppo…
sameer-coder Mar 16, 2018
907b8ff
cluster: const numWorkers added in test-inspect-support-for-node_options
sameer-coder Mar 17, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
cluster: Changed multi-line template string in test-inspect-support-f… 
…or-node_options

Changed multi-line template string in test-inspect-support-for-node_options
as per feedback from @jasnell. PR #19165

Fixes : #19026
  • Loading branch information
@sameer-coder
sameer-coder committed Mar 16, 2018
commit eb8f56736d27fd6b5253d857c2ed453eab99f3c9
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions test/parallel/test-inspect-support-for-node_options.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ function checkForInspectSupport(flag) {

cluster.on('exit', (worker, code, signal) => {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@richardlau richardlau Mar 16, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrap the callback in common.mustCall.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@sameer-coder sameer-coder Mar 16, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

if (worker.exitedAfterDisconnect === false) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@richardlau richardlau Mar 16, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be an assert rather than if-fail?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@sameer-coder sameer-coder Mar 16, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this look ok?

    cluster.on('exit', common.mustCall((worker, code, signal) => {
      const errMsg = `For NODE_OPTIONS ${nodeOptions}, failed to start cluster`;
      assert.strictEqual(worker.exitedAfterDisconnect, true, errMsg);
    }, 2));

assert.fail(`For ${nodeOptions}, failed to start cluster\
with inspect option`);
assert.fail(`For NODE_OPTIONS ${nodeOptions}, failed to start cluster`);
}
});
}
Expand Down