Repository navigation
Add hook or middleware for transforming tools/list responses #1757
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The MCP SDK provides no public mechanism to transform tools/list responses before they're sent to the client. This forces servers that need to augment tool definitions — for example, promoting fields from _meta to the tool root level — to access private internals and re-implement the SDK's serialization logic.
Concrete use case: ChatGPT mixed-auth security schemes
ChatGPT's Actions/Connectors platform expects securitySchemes as a root-level field on each tool definition in tools/list responses (OpenAI docs: Build with Auth).
However, the SDK's registerTool only supports securitySchemes inside _meta, and the
built-in tools/list handler serializes it there — not at the root level.
To bridge this gap, servers must:
- Access the private
_registeredToolsfield onMcpServer(viaas anycast) - Override the
ListToolsRequestSchemahandler viaserver.setRequestHandler - Re-implement the entire tool serialization — including
normalizeObjectSchema,
toJsonSchemaCompat,outputSchemahandling,annotations,execution, etc.
This is ~80 lines of duplicated SDK internals that will silently break on any refactor of
the tool listing logic. Multiple production MCP servers have independently converged on this
identical workaround.
Describe the solution you'd like
Any of the following would solve this cleanly (in rough order of preference):
Option A: Response transform hook
mcpServer.onToolsList((tools) => {
return tools.map(tool => ({
...tool,
securitySchemes: tool._meta?.securitySchemes,
}));
});A callback that receives the fully-serialized tool list and returns a (potentially modified) version. This is the most flexible option and avoids exposing internal data structures.
Option B: Middleware / chaining for setRequestHandler
// Get the current handler before replacing it
const original = server.getRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema);
server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async (req, extra) => {
const result = await original(req, extra);
// transform result.tools
return result;
});Adding a getRequestHandler method to Protocol would let consumers wrap existing handlers without re-implementing them. This is more general-purpose and benefits all request types.
Option C: Public read-only accessor for registered tools
const tools: ReadonlyMap<string, RegisteredTool> = mcpServer.registeredTools;This would at least eliminate the as any cast, though consumers would still need to re-implement serialization. (See also #1036.)
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Accessing
_registeredToolsdirectly — works today but requiresas any, duplicates serialization logic, and is fragile across SDK versions. We pin to patch versions (~1.26.0) to mitigate breakage. - Intercepting at the transport level — even more fragile; requires parsing/modifying JSON-RPC messages.
- Saving
RegisteredToolreferences at registration time — theRegisteredToolinterface provides.update()but no control over response serialization shape.
Additional context
- Related: Simplify public access to McpServer registered tools #1036 (public access to registered tools) and Dynamic Tool Registration Based on Authentication Context #836 (dynamic tools based on auth context) — both touch adjacent problems but neither addresses the core issue of response transformation.
- The
setRequestHandlerAPI is public and stable — the gap is specifically the inability to compose with the default handler rather than fully replacing it.
Activity
feat(core): add getRequestHandler to Protocol
tizmagik commentedon Mar 25, 2026
Opted for Option B as the most flexible/useful for other request types, if this is palatable:
feat(core): add getRequestHandler to Protocol
tizmagik commentedon Mar 30, 2026
Thanks for the review on #1759 @felixweinberger. I understand the hesitation about exposing Protocol internals.
I can see that
mcpServer.server.setRequestHandler('tools/list', ...)works for overriding the handler — that part is straightforward. The blocker is what goes inside that handler:_registeredToolsis private, so there's no way to access the tools that McpServer has registered in order to serialize them. The serialization logic (schema conversion,enabledfiltering,outputSchemahandling, etc.) is also inline in the handler rather than extracted as a reusable utility.So in practice, the "use Server" escape hatch requires either maintaining a parallel tool registry alongside McpServer's, or accessing
_registeredToolsviaas any— which is the fragile workaround described in this issue.A couple of alternatives that wouldn't touch Protocol at all:
Extract the tool serialization into a reusable utility — export the function that converts
RegisteredTool→Tool(the map callback insidesetToolRequestHandlers). Then users who override viamcpServer.server.setRequestHandlercould call it without duplicating the logic. Minimal API surface — just one utility function.A public read-only accessor for registered tools (Option C from this issue / related to Simplify public access to McpServer registered tools #1036) —
mcpServer.registeredToolsas aReadonlyMap. Combined with the exported serialization util above, this would let users build customtools/listhandlers cleanly.Neither of these touches Protocol. Would either direction be more acceptable?
Expose OAuth security schemes in tools/list (#216)