Skip to content

docs: complete account linking guidance in enterprise-managed authori…#2960

Open
karankraina wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
karankraina:docs/ema-mcp-authorization-servers
Open

docs: complete account linking guidance in enterprise-managed authori…#2960
karankraina wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
karankraina:docs/ema-mcp-authorization-servers

Conversation

@karankraina

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Complete the incomplete sentence in the "For MCP Authorization Servers" section regarding account linking with ID-JAG token claims.

Motivation and Context

The enterprise-managed authorization documentation had an incomplete bullet point (point 3 under "For MCP Authorization Servers") that cut off mid-sentence. This left implementers without guidance on how to handle account linking using subject and email claims from ID-JAG tokens.

How Has This Been Tested?

Documentation-only change. Verified the rendered content reads correctly and provides actionable guidance for MCP Authorization Server implementers.

Breaking Changes

None

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The completed sentence advises implementers to use the subject claim as the primary stable identifier and fall back to the email claim for matching pre-existing accounts created before enterprise-managed authorization was configured.

@karankraina karankraina requested review from a team as code owners June 22, 2026 07:48
@karankraina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hey @CaitieM20 Would love to have your review on this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant