@tadasant love the work that you're doing here! Should we also include #1401 here as well, linking to existing IG/WG meeting links and notes (tagged from GitHub issues)?

cc: @olaservo

@dend thank you for the thorough review! Accepted most of your suggestions, a couple minor followups inline.

@tadasant love the work that you're doing here! Should we also include #1401 here as well, linking to existing IG/WG meeting links and notes (tagged from GitHub issues)?

I'm not opposed to adding that though that feels like a chunk of work that doesn't require net new decisions worth including in the SEP process. So in the interest of limiting scope for this SEP, I think we can track that separately from this PR?

@tadasant @dend Is it possible for us to include/establish a WebMCP working group? This is being proposed as a web standard by the W3C Web Machine Learning Working Group with backers from Microsoft, Google, etc.

It would be beneficial to open a bridge between the two communities to ensure that learnings are shared. Please also let me know who to reach out to in order to add a community channel within the contributors discord server.

Hi @MiguelsPizza - I think the quickest path here is for this SEP to land (I expect clarity on it within ~1.5 weeks) and then use the process outlined for creation of new IG/WG's to make your pitch (FWIW: sounds like a good idea to me to make that a WG).

Thank you @tadasant - are you ready to put this for review? 😊

@MiguelsPizza +1 to what @tadasant mentioned above - once the SEP merges, you should follow the outlined process to work through a WG/IG creation (since logistically your ask is less related to the SEP itself 😊)

Thank you @tadasant - are you ready to put this for review? 😊

Yep let's do it @dend!

Confirming that this SEP was accepted by the Core Maintainers earlier today - we'll work with @tadasant to update the verbiage where needed and get this in merge-able shape.

Confirming that this SEP was accepted by the Core Maintainers earlier today - we'll work with @tadasant to update the verbiage where needed and get this in merge-able shape.

Do you have specific parts of this in mind that you want me to spend some more time with? I did an end-to-end read recently and IMO it could be good to merge as-is (at which point I will start actioning all the Discord changes and nudges to converge on this IG/WG paradigm), but I know we have some pending comment threads. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

@olaservo @ihrpr - can you please approve so we can merge? 😄

Thanks all - I will make moves on actioning the impacts of this in Discord this week.