Skip to content

Don't recommend to install '@types/foo' if that already exists#24815

Merged
4 commits merged into
masterfrom
untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist
Jun 21, 2018
Merged

Don't recommend to install '@types/foo' if that already exists#24815
4 commits merged into
masterfrom
untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ghost ghost commented Jun 8, 2018

Fixes #24781

@ghost ghost requested a review from DanielRosenwasser June 8, 2018 23:42
@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

DanielRosenwasser commented Jun 9, 2018

Almost there - I think it'd be helpful to say that if this resolved from an @types location, that we should elaborate with

If the '{0}' package actually exposes this module, consider sending a pull request to amend 'https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/{0}`

@ghost ghost merged commit 2b9166b into master Jun 21, 2018
@ghost ghost deleted the untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist branch June 21, 2018 17:19
@microsoft microsoft locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2025
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants