Update issue templates#23866
Conversation
|
|
||
| <!-- 🚨 STOP 🚨 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗣 🚨 𝑺𝑻𝑶𝑷 🚨 | ||
|
|
||
| Half of all issues filed here are duplicates, answered in the FAQ, or not appropriate for the bug tracker. Even if you think you've found a *bug*, please read the FAQ first, especially the Common "Bugs" That Aren't Bugs" section! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Common "Bugs" That Aren't Bugs"
One too many " here.
|
|
||
| **Actual behavior:** | ||
|
|
||
| **Playground Link:** <!-- A link to a TypeScript Playground "Share" link which demonstrates this behavior --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we should include an actual link to an empty playground rather than referencing "a TypeScript Playground".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
People seem to be doing a good job filling this in; I'm concerned that if we add in a literal link to the TypeScript playground, they'll think they don't have to do anything extra.
|
|
||
| ## Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| I attest that all of the following are true: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is a bit formal. why not drop the I attest part. they created the issue, so i am assuming the declaration is implied.
| [ ] This wouldn't change the behavior of existing JavaScript code | ||
| [ ] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions | ||
| [ ] This isn't a runtime feature that should be handled by TC39 instead | ||
| [ ] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript / JavaScript code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think the breakinc change should come in on top
| I attest that all of the following are true: | ||
| [ ] This wouldn't change the behavior of existing JavaScript code | ||
| [ ] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions | ||
| [ ] This isn't a runtime feature that should be handled by TC39 instead |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"should be handled by TC39" is a bit subjective. i would make it does this introduce any new syntax
| ## Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| I attest that all of the following are true: | ||
| [ ] This wouldn't change the behavior of existing JavaScript code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this one is a bit vague.. and how is different from the below two points? and why is the first?
|
yaaaay! it is happening!!
|
No description provided.