Unknown properties are assignable to Object in union#15257
Merged
sandersn merged 2 commits intoApr 18, 2017
Conversation
For the last week or so they have been treated as excess properties when assigning to a union type containing Object, but not when assigning directly to Object type.
Add test and accept baselines
ghost
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2017
|
Maybe |
Member
Author
|
Oh, subtype reduction? Maybe. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the last week or so they have been treated as excess properties when assigning to a union type containing Object, but not when assigning directly to Object type.
Fixes #15254