Use raw docstrings instead of escaping backslashes#14332
Merged
Conversation
QuLogic
reviewed
May 26, 2019
cbf8cd8 to
aead749
Compare
Member
That seems like a bug in pydocstyle that should be reported to them. |
Member
Author
|
Already done: PyCQA/pydocstyle#364 |
QuLogic
approved these changes
May 26, 2019
dstansby
approved these changes
May 27, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
Note: I would like to enforce pydocstyle D301 on this, but we have several cases of backslash as line continuation which would give false-positives. For now, we cannot check this automatically.