Improve annotation of the CloudWatch store#13511
Conversation
Test Results - Preflight, Unit23 001 tests ±0 21 158 ✅ ±0 6m 32s ⏱️ -45s Results for commit 5f146ff9. ± Comparison against base commit ca6b22b. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Test Results (amd64) - Acceptance7 tests ±0 5 ✅ ±0 2m 56s ⏱️ -14s Results for commit 5f146ff9. ± Comparison against base commit ca6b22b. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Test Results - Alternative Providers180 tests 39 ✅ 2m 30s ⏱️ Results for commit 5f146ff9. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
LocalStack Community integration with Pro 2 files 2 suites 46m 4s ⏱️ Results for commit 5f146ff9. |
Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap 5 files 5 suites 1h 1m 50s ⏱️ Results for commit 5f146ff9. |
This is a follow up of #13511. I made a mistake while adding the proper annotation to `histories`.
Motivation
As we are introducing a new store serialization layer, we need to make sure that all the stores are carefully annotated.
This PR adds a few type hints to the CloudWatch models.
Changes
AlarmHistoryItemto thehistoriesattributes).Tests
Related