Changed improper description about double dispatch in FAQ section#178
Merged
iluwatar merged 1 commit intoiluwatar:masterfrom Jul 29, 2015
npathai:master
Merged
Changed improper description about double dispatch in FAQ section#178iluwatar merged 1 commit intoiluwatar:masterfrom npathai:master
iluwatar merged 1 commit intoiluwatar:masterfrom
npathai:master
Conversation
Owner
|
Well spotted 👍 |
iluwatar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2015
Changed improper description about double dispatch in FAQ section
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The FAQ section about the difference between double dispatch and Visitor states that C++ and Java support this. But actually they do not support it. Have corrected the mistake.