Changes to the observer pattern#10
Merged
iluwatar merged 2 commits intoiluwatar:masterfrom Oct 21, 2014
bernardosulzbach:mafagafo-observer
Merged
Changes to the observer pattern#10iluwatar merged 2 commits intoiluwatar:masterfrom bernardosulzbach:mafagafo-observer
iluwatar merged 2 commits intoiluwatar:masterfrom
bernardosulzbach:mafagafo-observer
Conversation
iluwatar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2014
Changes to the observer pattern
pratigya0
pushed a commit
to pratigya0/java-design-patterns
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 3, 2023
adding new Linux answers
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A new diagram, hopefully better.
Some code rewriting I thought would make it neater.
Weather.java : lines 31 ~ 33 : cannot comment about performance, but it should not be an issue for this program. I spent some time trying to understand why a switch was used and, after seeing that it does not "change the order" of the enumerated constants, I just rewrote it to a simpler "getTheNext" version.