Skip to content

Fix/rust ci repin 822fa14e#136

Closed
hyperpolymath wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
fix/rust-ci-repin-822fa14e
Closed

Fix/rust ci repin 822fa14e#136
hyperpolymath wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
fix/rust-ci-repin-822fa14e

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Closes #

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (would change existing behaviour)
  • 🕳️ Soundness fix (fixes a checker/proof false-negative)
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🧹 Refactor / tech debt (behaviour-preserving)
  • ⚡ Performance
  • 🔧 Build / CI / tooling

How has this been verified?

Checklist

  • My commits are signed (git commit -S).
  • I ran the project's own checks/tests locally and they pass.
  • New files carry the correct SPDX-License-Identifier (code/config MPL-2.0,
    prose CC-BY-SA-4.0); I did not relicense existing files.
  • Docs are updated, and no public claim now overstates what the code does.
  • I have not introduced a soundness hole (or I have flagged where I might have).

Notes for reviewers

hyperpolymath and others added 7 commits May 31, 2026 00:23
…rse failure)

panic-attack rust-ci.yml + 42 other estate repos that pin
rust-ci-reusable.yml@cc5a372a have been failing with 0s-duration
"workflow file issue" parse errors since 2026-05-26 (when PR #45
introduced the thin-wrapper). cc5a372a IS reachable from
standards/main (verified via git merge-base --is-ancestor), so
this is NOT the orphan-SHA failure mode panic-attack#84 thought
it was fixing.

Empirical: every recent rust-ci run failed at parse time. The
reusable's content at cc5a372a is structurally fine. The simplest
hypothesis is that GH Actions has cached a bad resolution of this
specific SHA — repinning to a fresher merge-commit forces re-fetch.

822fa14e is the current HEAD of standards/main on the file
(standards#299, "pass --locked to cargo check/clippy/test").
Bumping forward to that brings the --locked safety along with
the unblock.

If 822fa14e also fails parse: the issue is not the SHA, and the
caller-side workflow file needs investigation (the workflow's
API-reported name field has been ".github/workflows/rust-ci.yml"
not "Rust CI", suggesting GH never parsed it successfully).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- C001: CodeQL language fixes
- C002: License identifier standardization
- C003: Outdated actions audit
- C004: Pin standards refs to SHA 861b5e9
- C005: Add workflow-level permissions
@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath enabled auto-merge (squash) June 24, 2026 10:33
@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing as superseded. The old rust-ci reusable pin bump to 822fa14e has been overtaken by newer mainline workflow fixes; main now uses d7c3b8f75d70ab640e6f37a4c8f9e6e8f2b6df56.

auto-merge was automatically disabled June 24, 2026 11:40

Pull request was closed

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath deleted the fix/rust-ci-repin-822fa14e branch June 24, 2026 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants