Test on 3.10.0-beta.2 - #1069
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1069 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 70.71% 70.48% -0.24%
===========================================
Files 79 79
Lines 7616 7616
===========================================
- Hits 5386 5368 -18
- Misses 2230 2248 +18 |
|
@Mergifyio rebase |
|
Command
|
|
I tried to fix the codecov issues by using the codecov action, but maybe the problems are not even caused by my changes: codecov/codecov-action#330 |
|
This would also remove coverage collection when testing on Travis (which is only relevant for Socketcan). |
I don't think so. For travis it is still called via tox file. @hardbyte the replies on stackoverflow suggest that rotating the codecov token might help. Could you try? |
Yes and No. If I understand it correctly, that is removed from the tox file here. |
But only for the github environment. The command is still present for Travis |
|
The failures of Travis should be fixed on develop by now, so an update should get this CI to become green: @Mergifyio update |
|
Command
|
hardbyte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for the delay looking at this.
I assume the codecov token is fine as is?
Co-authored-by: Felix Divo <4403130+felixdivo@users.noreply.github.com>
Pytest update was necessary due to pytest-dev/pytest#8540
Trace