fix: allow undirected fixed length pattern#781
Conversation
|
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #781 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.49% 84.07% -0.43%
==========================================
Files 66 66
Lines 3179 3340 +161
Branches 387 401 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 2686 2808 +122
- Misses 493 532 +39 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@SemyonSinchenko, I actually cannot understand the comment from Codecov. If there is anything I have to do, please let me know. |
This codecov is a legacy from the ancient time. Someone should fix or remove it, but I dont have time :( Ignore it, it is really strange. |
|
Thanks again for owning this @goungoun ! |
|
@SemyonSinchenko I always appreciate for your help! |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It aims to support undirected fixed length pattern
(u)-[*2]-(v).Why are the changes needed?
The pattern fails, which is unexpected.
It may not easy to come up with a workaround by end users. It is to rewrite the pattern manually,
(u)-[*2..2]-(v).What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It implements exactly the way of workaround by adding the another pattern to the
findmethod directly.It does not yet cover undirected fixed-length chaining patterns such as
(u)-[*2]-(v); (v)-[]->(k), but I am opening this PR as a quick fix in case someone needs it.