feat(bigtable): initializing the new data client - #18080
Draft
daniel-sanche wants to merge 7 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Additional system tests for testing shim compatibility with the classic client interface. Also fixes a bug where encountering a retriable error after another retriable error mid-stream raised an exception instead of retrying. Fixes #1156 --------- Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes: - Added a new property `new_table_data_client` (might need to be renamed) in the classic client for the new table data client - Added two hidden kwargs (`client_info` and `disable_background_channel_refresh`) to the new data client constructor to support the classic client. Fixes #1157
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Migrating over @gkevinzheng PR from bigtable monorepo googleapis/python-bigtable#1238
Original description:
Note to reviewers: This PR has already been reviewed and merged to a staging branch, with the intention of doing a single merge to main. We are now planning to slowly rollout these changes back to the main branch. Minimal re-review should be necessary