Skip to content

Ditch apitools and implement it ourselves #935

Closed
Closed
Ditch apitools and implement it ourselves#935
Assignees
tseaver
Labels
api: storageIssues related to the Cloud Storage API.

Description

@dhermes
dhermes
opened on Jun 22, 2015

After a quick discussion in today's standup, we decided to just implement the small feature-set from apitools ourselves.

Main reasons

  • Dead library
  • No docs
  • Small feature set used by us

/cc @craigcitro

Activity

  1. dhermes
    added
    api: storageIssues related to the Cloud Storage API.
    on Jun 22, 2015

  2. craigcitro commented on Jun 22, 2015

    @craigcitro
    craigcitro
    on Jun 22, 2015
    Contributor

    👍

  3. dhermes commented on Jun 22, 2015

    @dhermes
    dhermes
    on Jun 22, 2015
    ContributorAuthor

    I think it's worth tackling #909 directly after doing this.

  4. tseaver commented on Nov 6, 2015

    @tseaver
    tseaver
    on Nov 6, 2015
    Contributor

    Re-created as #1186.

  5. tseaver
    closed this as completedon Nov 6, 2015
  6. JustinBeckwith
    assigned
    tseaver
    on Feb 1, 2021
  7. parthea
    added 3 commits that reference this issue on Nov 24, 2025

    fix: fix wrong scopes for self signed jwt (#935)

    cfca63b

    build: update constraints files (#935)

    85f0d4f

    build: update constraints files (#935)

    638c70c
  8. parthea
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 6, 2026

    chore(python): rename default branch to main (#935)

    447948a

    chore(main): release 3.33.0 (#935)

    f88c70f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

api: storageIssues related to the Cloud Storage API.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions