Skip to content

Validate workflow to check that all codeql-action versions are the same #3099

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mbg merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2025
+103 −2
Merged

Validate workflow to check that all codeql-action versions are the same #3099

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
bb98ff4
Validate workflow to check that all `codeql-action` versions are the …
mbg Sep 10, 2025
754f2e1
Simplify `step.uses` condition
mbg Sep 10, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Simplify step.uses condition
  • Loading branch information
@mbg
mbg committed Sep 10, 2025
commit 754f2e184f461607b45a1d55105127a48df3a7a9
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lib/init-action.js
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

5 changes: 1 addition & 4 deletions src/workflow.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -168,10 +168,7 @@ export async function getWorkflowErrors(
for (const job of Object.values(doc?.jobs || {})) {
if (Array.isArray(job.steps)) {
for (const step of job.steps) {
if (
step.uses !== undefined &&
step.uses.startsWith("github/codeql-action/")
) {
if (step.uses?.startsWith("github/codeql-action/")) {
const parts = step.uses.split("@");
if (parts.length >= 2) {
Comment on lines +172 to +173
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@esbena esbena Sep 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: don't we have this kind of parsing elsewhere already?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@mbg mbg Sep 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have

  const format = new RegExp(
    "(?<owner>[^/]+)/(?<repo>[^/]+)/(?<path>[^@]+)@(?<ref>.*)",
  );

in getRemoteConfig, but I thought I'd keep this simple.

codeqlStepRefs.push(parts[parts.length - 1]);
Copy link

Copilot AI Sep 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic assumes that splitting on '@' will always produce the version as the last part, but this may not handle edge cases correctly. For example, if step.uses is 'github/codeql-action/init@v2@extra', this would extract 'extra' instead of 'v2@extra'. Consider using parts.slice(1).join('@') to handle multiple '@' characters properly.

Suggested change
codeqlStepRefs.push(parts[parts.length - 1]);
codeqlStepRefs.push(parts.slice(1).join("@"));

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Expand Down
Loading