Draft
Conversation
Uses the new `DuckTyping` module to handle recognising whether a class is a container or not. Only trivial test changes (one version uses "class", the other "Class"). Note that the ported query has no understanding of built-in classes. At some point we'll likely want to replace `hasUnresolvedBase` (which will hold for any class that extends a built-in) with something that's aware of the built-in classes.
First fix handles the case where there's interference from a class-based decorator on a function. In this case, _technically_ we have an instance of the decorator class, but in practice this decorator will (hopefully) forward all accesses to the thing it wraps. The second fix has to do with methods that are added dynamically using `setattr`. In this case, we cannot be sure that the relevant methods are actually missing.
Eliminates cases where we explicitly check whether the object in question is an instance of (a subclass of) a built-in container type.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uses the new
DuckTypingmodule to handle recognising whether a class is a container or not. Only trivial test changes (one version uses "class", the other "Class").Note that the ported query has no understanding of built-in classes. At some point we'll likely want to replace
hasUnresolvedBase(which will hold for any class that extends a built-in) with something that's aware of the built-in classes.